On 8/10/2020 5:54 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> On all newer Layerscape SoCs, the crypto module is just partially
> disabled on non-E parts. Thus it doesn't make sense to completely remove
> the node. Linux will figure out what is there and what is not.
>
Could add a clarification here, saying "parti
>-Original Message-
>From: U-Boot On Behalf Of Michael Walle
>Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 8:24 PM
>To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>Cc: Priyanka Jain ; Horia Geanta
>; Michael Walle
>Subject: [PATCH v2] armv8: layerscape: don't remove crypto node if just
>parti
Michael Walle-2 wrote
> On all newer Layerscape SoCs, the crypto module is just partially
> disabled on non-E parts. Thus it doesn't make sense to completely remove
> the node. Linux will figure out what is there and what is not.
>
> Just remove it for older SoCs, where the module is indeed comple
On all newer Layerscape SoCs, the crypto module is just partially
disabled on non-E parts. Thus it doesn't make sense to completely remove
the node. Linux will figure out what is there and what is not.
Just remove it for older SoCs, where the module is indeed completely
disabled on non-E parts.
S
4 matches
Mail list logo
