Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: doesn't need check stack size when dtb is not built

2020-03-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:20:43AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > The commit 5fed97af20da ("Makefile: ensure DTB doesn't overflow into > initial stack") adds an extra check for stack size in BSS if > CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_BSS_OFFSET is enabled. > This check, however, doesn't make sense under the con

Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: doesn't need check stack size when dtb is not built

2020-03-10 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Tom, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:56:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 3/9/20 6:20 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > The commit 5fed97af20da ("Makefile: ensure DTB doesn't overflow into > > initial stack") adds an extra check for stack size in BSS if > > CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_BSS_OFFSET is enabled. >

Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: doesn't need check stack size when dtb is not built

2020-03-10 Thread Stephen Warren
On 3/9/20 6:20 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: The commit 5fed97af20da ("Makefile: ensure DTB doesn't overflow into initial stack") adds an extra check for stack size in BSS if CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_BSS_OFFSET is enabled. This check, however, doesn't make sense under the configuration where control dtb w

[PATCH v2] Makefile: doesn't need check stack size when dtb is not built

2020-03-09 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
The commit 5fed97af20da ("Makefile: ensure DTB doesn't overflow into initial stack") adds an extra check for stack size in BSS if CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_BSS_OFFSET is enabled. This check, however, doesn't make sense under the configuration where control dtb won't be built in and it should be void in su