Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-06 Thread Mikhail Kshevetskiy
On 05.11.2024 19:02, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 15:15, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:03, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > On M

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:03:49PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 11:26, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:07:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Mikhail Kshevetskiy
On 06.11.2024 02:00, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:59:57PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: >> On 05.11.2024 21:26, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:07:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, N

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:59:57PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > > On 05.11.2024 21:26, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:07:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:15:25AM -0700, Simon

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 11:26, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:07:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:15:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > > > On Tue

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Mikhail Kshevetskiy
On 05.11.2024 21:26, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:07:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:15:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Peter, On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:07:17AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:15:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 5 No

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 08:47, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:15:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:03, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On M

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 15:15, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:03, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:31

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:15:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:03, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 20

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Peter, On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:03, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:31:30PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > > > > > > > Legacy TCP stack i

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:03:44AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:31:30PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > > > > > Legacy TCP stack is bad. Here are some of the known issues: > > > * tcp packet from other

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 13:03, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:31:30PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > > > > > Legacy TCP stack is bad. Here are some of the known issues: > > > * tcp packet from other connection

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 16:32, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:31:30PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > > > Legacy TCP stack is bad. Here are some of the known issues: > > * tcp packet from other connection can break a current one > > * tcp send sequence always starts fr

Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-11-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:31:30PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > Legacy TCP stack is bad. Here are some of the known issues: > * tcp packet from other connection can break a current one > * tcp send sequence always starts from zero > * bad tcp options processing > * strange assumptions o

[PATCH v12 00/13] net: tcp: improve tcp support in legacy stack

2024-10-28 Thread Mikhail Kshevetskiy
Legacy TCP stack is bad. Here are some of the known issues: * tcp packet from other connection can break a current one * tcp send sequence always starts from zero * bad tcp options processing * strange assumptions on packet size for selective acknowledge * tcp interface assumes one of the two