On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 00:34, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 4:55 AM Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> >
> > lmb_alloc_addr() is just calling lmb_alloc_addr_flags() with LMB_NONE
> > There's not much we gain from this abstraction, so let's remove the
> > latter, add a flags argument t
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 4:55 AM Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> lmb_alloc_addr() is just calling lmb_alloc_addr_flags() with LMB_NONE
> There's not much we gain from this abstraction, so let's remove the
> latter, add a flags argument to lmb_alloc_addr() and make the code a
> bit easier to follow.
>
>
lmb_alloc_addr() is just calling lmb_alloc_addr_flags() with LMB_NONE
There's not much we gain from this abstraction, so let's remove the
latter, add a flags argument to lmb_alloc_addr() and make the code a
bit easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
fs/fs.c |
3 matches
Mail list logo