Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm: mach-imx: cmd_nandbcb fix bad block handling

2022-05-11 Thread Tim Harvey
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi Tim > > Do you have an alternative board to test? > Michael, Yes sorry... I tested the series and had the reply in my draft folder. I sent it just now in response to the cover letter. Best regards, Tim > Michael > > On

Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm: mach-imx: cmd_nandbcb fix bad block handling

2022-05-10 Thread Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Hi Tim Do you have an alternative board to test? Michael On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:41 PM Han Xu wrote: > > On 22/04/27 07:50AM, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > The badblock should be skipped properly in reading and writing. > > Fix the logic. The bcb struct is written, skipping the bad block, > > s

Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm: mach-imx: cmd_nandbcb fix bad block handling

2022-05-06 Thread Han Xu
On 22/04/27 07:50AM, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > The badblock should be skipped properly in reading and writing. > Fix the logic. The bcb struct is written, skipping the bad block, > so we need to read using the same logic. This was tested create > bad block in the area and then flash it and read it

[PATCH V2 3/4] arm: mach-imx: cmd_nandbcb fix bad block handling

2022-04-26 Thread Michael Trimarchi
The badblock should be skipped properly in reading and writing. Fix the logic. The bcb struct is written, skipping the bad block, so we need to read using the same logic. This was tested create bad block in the area and then flash it and read it back. Cc: Han Xu Cc: Fabio Estevam Signed-off-by: