Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] Fix handling of optional blobs in binman

Hi Simon, Am Freitag, dem 30.05.2025 um 12:18 +0100 schrieb Simon Glass: > Hi Yannic, > > On Tue, 27 May 2025 at 14:24, Yannic Moog wrote: > > > > This series solves a contradiction regarding ext blobs packaged in > > binman. When they are marked as optional, by default they are faked, two > >

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] Fix handling of optional blobs in binman

Hi Yannic, On Tue, 27 May 2025 at 14:24, Yannic Moog wrote: > > This series solves a contradiction regarding ext blobs packaged in > binman. When they are marked as optional, by default they are faked, two > messages are emitted. One says the image is not functional the other > says the image is

[PATCH RFC v2 0/8] Fix handling of optional blobs in binman

This series solves a contradiction regarding ext blobs packaged in binman. When they are marked as optional, by default they are faked, two messages are emitted. One says the image is not functional the other says the image is still functional. Both concern the same binman entry/blob. Binman is se