On 5/5/20 10:54 AM, Harald Seiler wrote:
> Hello Fabio,
Hi
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 12:28 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:21 PM Harald Seiler wrote:
>>
>>> With or without the revert?
>>
>> When I change the defconfig like:
>>
>> --- a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
>> +++
Hello Fabio,
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 12:28 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:21 PM Harald Seiler wrote:
>
> > With or without the revert?
>
> When I change the defconfig like:
>
> --- a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
> @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ CO
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:21 PM Harald Seiler wrote:
> With or without the revert?
When I change the defconfig like:
--- a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
+++ b/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
@@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC=y
CONFIG_SYS_RELOC_GD_ENV_ADDR=y
CONFIG_ENV_VARS_UBOOT_RUNTIME_CONF
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 12:18 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM Harald Seiler wrote:
>
> > "Failed to find clock node. Check device tree" comes from spl_board_init()
> > in board/freescale/imx8mp_evk/spl.c; line 56:
> >
> > ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM Harald Seiler wrote:
> "Failed to find clock node. Check device tree" comes from spl_board_init()
> in board/freescale/imx8mp_evk/spl.c; line 56:
>
> ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_CLK,
> "clock-controller@303
Hello,
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 16:32 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/4/20 4:27 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:05 AM Harald Seiler wrote:
> > > From: Marek Vasut
> > >
> > > Board files should not re-implement do_reset() to work around this
> > > function not
On 5/4/20 4:27 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:05 AM Harald Seiler wrote:
>>
>> From: Marek Vasut
>>
>> Board files should not re-implement do_reset() to work around this
>> function not being defined in for specific configurations. Rather,
>> the fix is to compile
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:05 AM Harald Seiler wrote:
>
> From: Marek Vasut
>
> Board files should not re-implement do_reset() to work around this
> function not being defined in for specific configurations. Rather,
> the fix is to compile in drivers which implement this properly.
> This pat
> From: Marek Vasut
> Board files should not re-implement do_reset() to work around this
> function not being defined in for specific configurations. Rather,
> the fix is to compile in drivers which implement this properly.
> This patch enables sysreset and watchdog drivers in SPL and ties
> them
From: Marek Vasut
Board files should not re-implement do_reset() to work around this
function not being defined in for specific configurations. Rather,
the fix is to compile in drivers which implement this properly.
This patch enables sysreset and watchdog drivers in SPL and ties
them together to
10 matches
Mail list logo
