On 12/19/23 18:39, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hello Eugen,
>
> Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 04:32:07PM +0200 schrieb Eugen Hristev:
>> On 12/12/23 18:04, Alexander Dahl wrote:
>>> These removed definitions were specific to some sam9 SoCs, but not
>>> generic over all at91 SoCs. The correct SoC specific d
Hello Eugen,
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 04:32:07PM +0200 schrieb Eugen Hristev:
> On 12/12/23 18:04, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > These removed definitions were specific to some sam9 SoCs, but not
> > generic over all at91 SoCs. The correct SoC specific definitions for
> > ATMEL_BASE_PMECC are spread o
On 12/12/23 18:04, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> These removed definitions were specific to some sam9 SoCs, but not
> generic over all at91 SoCs. The correct SoC specific definitions for
> ATMEL_BASE_PMECC are spread over different header files in
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach directory.
>
> Fixes
These removed definitions were specific to some sam9 SoCs, but not
generic over all at91 SoCs. The correct SoC specific definitions for
ATMEL_BASE_PMECC are spread over different header files in
arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach directory.
Fixes a build error on a custon board based on SAMA5D2:
4 matches
Mail list logo
