On 18.05.20 18:26, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
On 5/8/20 11:54 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 08.05.20 17:40, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
On 5/4/20 8:38 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Build the secured board dtbs (.dtb_HS) as part of the regular dtb build
on CONFIG_TI_SECURE_DEVICE targets. This avo
On 5/8/20 11:54 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 08.05.20 17:40, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 5/4/20 8:38 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>>
>>> Build the secured board dtbs (.dtb_HS) as part of the regular dtb build
>>> on CONFIG_TI_SECURE_DEVICE targets. This avoids rebuilding them,
>>> po
On 08.05.20 17:40, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
On 5/4/20 8:38 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Build the secured board dtbs (.dtb_HS) as part of the regular dtb build
on CONFIG_TI_SECURE_DEVICE targets. This avoids rebuilding them,
possibly overwriting artifacts that are in use, as it is done
On 5/4/20 8:38 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> Build the secured board dtbs (.dtb_HS) as part of the regular dtb build
> on CONFIG_TI_SECURE_DEVICE targets. This avoids rebuilding them,
> possibly overwriting artifacts that are in use, as it is done so far.
>
> In the same run, fix
From: Jan Kiszka
Build the secured board dtbs (.dtb_HS) as part of the regular dtb build
on CONFIG_TI_SECURE_DEVICE targets. This avoids rebuilding them,
possibly overwriting artifacts that are in use, as it is done so far.
In the same run, fix needless rebuilding of the secured spl dtb.
Fixes:
5 matches
Mail list logo