Re: [PATCH 3/6] spl: LOAD_FIT_FULL: Relocate FDT for u-boot payloads

On 3/29/21 2:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Alexandru, diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c index 8f6c8dba6f..e63f05bb33 100644 --- a/common/spl/spl.c +++ b/common/spl/spl.c @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image, { bootm_header

Re: [PATCH 3/6] spl: LOAD_FIT_FULL: Relocate FDT for u-boot payloads

Hi Alexandru, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 10:32, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > > U-Boot expects the FDT to be located right after the _end > linker symbol (see fdtdec.c: board_fdt_blob_setup()) > > The "basic" LOAD_FIT path is aware of this limitation, and relocates > the FDT at the expected location. Gu

[PATCH 3/6] spl: LOAD_FIT_FULL: Relocate FDT for u-boot payloads

U-Boot expects the FDT to be located right after the _end linker symbol (see fdtdec.c: board_fdt_blob_setup()) The "basic" LOAD_FIT path is aware of this limitation, and relocates the FDT at the expected location. Guessing the expected location probably only works reliably on 32-bit arm, and it fe