On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:37:15AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 13:04 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 09:38:19AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> >
> > > In various cases logical memory blocks are coalesced; As a result
> > > doing
> > > a strict check whethe
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 13:04 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 09:38:19AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
>
> > In various cases logical memory blocks are coalesced; As a result
> > doing
> > a strict check whether memory blocks are the same doesn't
> > necessarily
> > work as a previous
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 09:38:19AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> In various cases logical memory blocks are coalesced; As a result doing
> a strict check whether memory blocks are the same doesn't necessarily
> work as a previous addition of a given block might have been merged into
> a bigger blo
In various cases logical memory blocks are coalesced; As a result doing
a strict check whether memory blocks are the same doesn't necessarily
work as a previous addition of a given block might have been merged into
a bigger block.
Fix this by considering a block is already registered if it's a pur
4 matches
Mail list logo