Re: [PATCH 3/3] configs: stm32mp1: Fix misleading SPL size limitations

2021-04-09 Thread Patrice CHOTARD
Hi Alexandru On 3/22/21 2:20 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > A now removed comment promises to "limit SYSRAM usage to first 128 KB". > This would imply that only SYSRAM from 0x2ffc - 0x2ffe would be > used. This is not what happens at all. > > First, SPL_MAX_SIZE is referenced from SPL_TEX

Re: [PATCH 3/3] configs: stm32mp1: Fix misleading SPL size limitations

2021-04-07 Thread Patrick DELAUNAY
Hi, On 3/22/21 2:20 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: A now removed comment promises to "limit SYSRAM usage to first 128 KB". This would imply that only SYSRAM from 0x2ffc - 0x2ffe would be used. This is not what happens at all. First, SPL_MAX_SIZE is referenced from SPL_TEXT_BASE, which on

Re: [PATCH 3/3] configs: stm32mp1: Fix misleading SPL size limitations

2021-03-26 Thread Patrice CHOTARD
Hi Alexandru On 3/22/21 2:20 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > A now removed comment promises to "limit SYSRAM usage to first 128 KB". > This would imply that only SYSRAM from 0x2ffc - 0x2ffe would be > used. This is not what happens at all. > > First, SPL_MAX_SIZE is referenced from SPL_TEX

[PATCH 3/3] configs: stm32mp1: Fix misleading SPL size limitations

2021-03-22 Thread Alexandru Gagniuc
A now removed comment promises to "limit SYSRAM usage to first 128 KB". This would imply that only SYSRAM from 0x2ffc - 0x2ffe would be used. This is not what happens at all. First, SPL_MAX_SIZE is referenced from SPL_TEXT_BASE, which on all existing configs is set to 0x2ffc2500, not SYSRA