Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-11-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/led/led-uclass.c b/drivers/led/led-uclass.c > > > > > > index 5a5d07b9a7..0232fa84de 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/led/led-uclass.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/led/led-uclass.c > > > > > > @@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ static int led_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) > > > >

Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-11-14 Thread Marek Vasut
On 11/14/23 13:11, Christian Gmeiner wrote: ping Am Mo., 23. Okt. 2023 um 12:45 Uhr schrieb Marek Vasut : On 10/23/23 10:51, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: On 19/10/2023 15.54, Marek Vasut wrote: On 10/19/23 11:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->lab

Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-11-14 Thread Christian Gmeiner
ping Am Mo., 23. Okt. 2023 um 12:45 Uhr schrieb Marek Vasut : > > On 10/23/23 10:51, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On 19/10/2023 15.54, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 10/19/23 11:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >>> If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->label, don't > >>> override that. T

Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-10-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/23/23 10:51, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: On 19/10/2023 15.54, Marek Vasut wrote: On 10/19/23 11:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->label, don't override that. This is necessary for an upcoming driver for ti,lp5562, where the DT binding unfortun

Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-10-23 Thread Christian Gmeiner
Am Mo., 23. Okt. 2023 um 11:30 Uhr schrieb Rasmus Villemoes : > > On 19/10/2023 15.54, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 10/19/23 11:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->label, don't > >> override that. This is necessary for an upcoming driver for ti,lp55

Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-10-23 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 19/10/2023 15.54, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/19/23 11:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->label, don't >> override that. This is necessary for an upcoming driver for ti,lp5562, >> where the DT binding unfortunately says to use "chan-name" and no

Re: [PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-10-19 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/19/23 11:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->label, don't override that. This is necessary for an upcoming driver for ti,lp5562, where the DT binding unfortunately says to use "chan-name" and not "label". Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes ---

[PATCH 2/6] led-uclass: honour ->label field populated by driver's own .bind

2023-10-19 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
If the driver's own .bind method has populated uc_plat->label, don't override that. This is necessary for an upcoming driver for ti,lp5562, where the DT binding unfortunately says to use "chan-name" and not "label". Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes --- drivers/led/led-uclass.c | 4 +++- 1 file ch