Re: [PATCH 2/3] cmd: Allow building ufetch without CONFIG_BLK

2024-12-09 Thread J . Neuschäfer
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 04:04:50PM +0100, Caleb Connolly wrote: > On 05/12/2024 19:35, J. Neuschäfer via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: "J. Neuschäfer" > > > > The ufetch command is still quite useful on systems without block > > device support; remove the CONFIG_BLK dependency and make sure the code

Re: [PATCH 2/3] cmd: Allow building ufetch without CONFIG_BLK

2024-12-09 Thread Caleb Connolly
On 09/12/2024 17:51, J. Neuschäfer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 04:04:50PM +0100, Caleb Connolly wrote: >> On 05/12/2024 19:35, J. Neuschäfer via B4 Relay wrote: >>> From: "J. Neuschäfer" >>> >>> The ufetch command is still quite useful on systems without block >>> device support; remove th

Re: [PATCH 2/3] cmd: Allow building ufetch without CONFIG_BLK

2024-12-09 Thread Caleb Connolly
On 05/12/2024 19:35, J. Neuschäfer via B4 Relay wrote: > From: "J. Neuschäfer" > > The ufetch command is still quite useful on systems without block > device support; remove the CONFIG_BLK dependency and make sure the code > compiles/works with and without CONFIG_BLK. > > Signed-off-by: J. Ne

[PATCH 2/3] cmd: Allow building ufetch without CONFIG_BLK

2024-12-05 Thread J . Neuschäfer via B4 Relay
From: "J. Neuschäfer" The ufetch command is still quite useful on systems without block device support; remove the CONFIG_BLK dependency and make sure the code compiles/works with and without CONFIG_BLK. Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer --- cmd/Kconfig | 1 - cmd/ufetch.c | 10 +++--- 2 file