Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 04:00:27PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 16.02.24 2:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:20:14AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 15. Februar 2024 23:00:32 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:53:59PM +01

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-16 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 16.02.24 2:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:20:14AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: Am 15. Februar 2024 23:00:32 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:53:59PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: Am 15. Februar 2024 22:28:24 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : On Thu, Fe

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:10:19AM +, Paul Barker wrote: > On 15/02/2024 21:10, Tom Rini wrote: > > The first big issue is that the "gcc" file talked a lot about the > > general build requirements as well, but was titled in a gcc-centric > > manner. Solve this by renaming the file to compile.rs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:20:14AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Am 15. Februar 2024 23:00:32 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : > >On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:53:59PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> > >> > >> Am 15. Februar 2024 22:28:24 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : > >> >On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-16 Thread Paul Barker
On 15/02/2024 21:10, Tom Rini wrote: > The first big issue is that the "gcc" file talked a lot about the > general build requirements as well, but was titled in a gcc-centric > manner. Solve this by renaming the file to compile.rst and more fully > reflecting that it is general build instructions.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-15 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Am 15. Februar 2024 23:00:32 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : >On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:53:59PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> >> >> Am 15. Februar 2024 22:28:24 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : >> >On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 15. Februar 202

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:53:59PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Am 15. Februar 2024 22:28:24 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : > >On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> > >> > >> Am 15. Februar 2024 22:10:25 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : > >> >The first big issue is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-15 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Am 15. Februar 2024 22:28:24 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : >On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> >> >> Am 15. Februar 2024 22:10:25 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : >> >The first big issue is that the "gcc" file talked a lot about the >> >general build requirements as well, b

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Am 15. Februar 2024 22:10:25 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : > >The first big issue is that the "gcc" file talked a lot about the > >general build requirements as well, but was titled in a gcc-centric > >manner. Solve this by renam

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-15 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Am 15. Februar 2024 22:10:25 MEZ schrieb Tom Rini : >The first big issue is that the "gcc" file talked a lot about the >general build requirements as well, but was titled in a gcc-centric >manner. Solve this by renaming the file to compile.rst and more fully >reflecting that it is general build

[PATCH 2/2] doc: Rework the gcc section to reflect general build instructions

2024-02-15 Thread Tom Rini
The first big issue is that the "gcc" file talked a lot about the general build requirements as well, but was titled in a gcc-centric manner. Solve this by renaming the file to compile.rst and more fully reflecting that it is general build instructions. Next, add a section about the prebuilt toolch