Hi Alper,
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 14:51, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2020 18:11, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Alper,
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Alper Nebi Yasak
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26/10/2020 22:22, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> I've added a few test cases along these lines in v2,
On 03/11/2020 18:11, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Alper,
>
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Alper Nebi Yasak
> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2020 22:22, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> I've added a few test cases along these lines in v2, and one of them
>>> certainly different behaviour. This is good actually since it
Hi Alper,
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2020 22:22, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 15:29, Alper Nebi Yasak
> > wrote:
> >> On 19/10/2020 05:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> for entry in self._entries.values():
> >>> data = en
On 26/10/2020 22:22, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 15:29, Alper Nebi Yasak
> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2020 05:41, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> for entry in self._entries.values():
>>> data = entry.GetData()
>>> -base = self.pad_before + (entry.offset or 0) -
>
Hi Alper,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 15:29, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>
> On 19/10/2020 05:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Create a new _BuildSectionData() to hold the code that is now in
> > GetData(), so that it is clearly separated from entry.GetData() base
> > function.
> >
> > Separate out the 'pad-bef
On 19/10/2020 05:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> Create a new _BuildSectionData() to hold the code that is now in
> GetData(), so that it is clearly separated from entry.GetData() base
> function.
>
> Separate out the 'pad-before' processing to make this easier to
> understand.
>
> Unfortunately this br
Create a new _BuildSectionData() to hold the code that is now in
GetData(), so that it is clearly separated from entry.GetData() base
function.
Separate out the 'pad-before' processing to make this easier to
understand.
Unfortunately this breaks the testDual test. Rather than squash several
patch
7 matches
Mail list logo