Re: [PATCH 10/23] blk: Rename HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE

2022-08-11 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Takahiro, On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 18:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 09:46:55AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > This option is fact really related to SPL. For U-Boot proper we always use > > driver model for block devices, so CONFIG_BLK is enabled if block devices > > are in

Re: [PATCH 10/23] blk: Rename HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE

2022-08-07 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 09:46:55AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > This option is fact really related to SPL. For U-Boot proper we always use > driver model for block devices, so CONFIG_BLK is enabled if block devices > are in use. > > It is only for SPL that we have two cases: > > - SPL_BLK is enabl

[PATCH 10/23] blk: Rename HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE

2022-08-07 Thread Simon Glass
This option is fact really related to SPL. For U-Boot proper we always use driver model for block devices, so CONFIG_BLK is enabled if block devices are in use. It is only for SPL that we have two cases: - SPL_BLK is enabled, in which case we use driver model and blk-uclass.c - SPL_BLK is not ena