Hi,
Let me know if you want me to test this on my imx6q d1
-derek
Sent using my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
On April 17, 2020 7:41:03 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:33 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
Ok, I have a mx6dl wandboad here and I managed to reprodu
For the record, I also tested this on a Wandboard Dual RevC1 and it worked
there, too.
-derek
On Fri, April 17, 2020 10:50 am, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Fabio,
>
> Am 17.04.2020 um 14:30 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:00 AM Derek Atkins wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
Hello Fabio,
Am 17.04.2020 um 14:30 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:00 AM Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Let me know if you want me to test this on my imx6q d1
Derek confirmed that v2 worked on his imx6q wandboard revD1 and I have
just submitted v2 to the list.
Hopeful
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:00 AM Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Let me know if you want me to test this on my imx6q d1
Derek confirmed that v2 worked on his imx6q wandboard revD1 and I have
just submitted v2 to the list.
Hopefully it will also work on your imx6dl wandboard revD1.
Thank
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:33 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Ok, I have a mx6dl wandboad here and I managed to reproduce the issue
> you reported.
>
> Let me investigate this issue.
Ok, I managed to fix it.
I will submit a new series soon.
Thanks
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:15 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:56 AM Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
> > So it seems, output on console gets somehow lost, but bootcount counts down
> > and loads linux ... may I missed something?
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> On
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:56 AM Heiko Schocher wrote:
> So it seems, output on console gets somehow lost, but bootcount counts down
> and loads linux ... may I missed something?
Thanks for testing.
On my console, I get the full output on a i.MX6Q revB1:
http://code.bulix.org/buuwfu-1
Hello Fabio,
Am 17.04.2020 um 02:12 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
The detection of the revD1 version is based on the presence of the PMIC.
Currently revb1 device trees are used for mx6q/mx6dl variants, which
do not have the PMIC nodes.
This causes revD1 boards to be incorrectly be detected as revB1.
Sorry for sending this twice.
The first submission had the wrong patch 3/5.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:10 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> The detection of the revD1 version is based on the presence of the PMIC.
>
> Currently revb1 device trees are used for mx6q/mx6dl variants, which
> do not have the
The detection of the revD1 version is based on the presence of the PMIC.
Currently revb1 device trees are used for mx6q/mx6dl variants, which
do not have the PMIC nodes.
This causes revD1 boards to be incorrectly be detected as revB1.
Use the revd1 device trees, so that the PMIC node can be foun
The detection of the revD1 version is based on the presence of the PMIC.
Currently revb1 device trees are used for mx6q/mx6dl variants, which
do not have the PMIC nodes.
This causes revD1 boards to be incorrectly be detected as revB1.
Use the revd1 device trees, so that the PMIC node can be foun
11 matches
Mail list logo
