On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Eugen Hristev wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/24 17:57, Zixun LI wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:13 PM Eugen Hristev
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> +static bool at91_get_port_pio(struct at91_port *at91_port, int offset)
> >>
> >> The name get_port_pio
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:13 PM Eugen Hristev wrote:
>
>
> > +static bool at91_get_port_pio(struct at91_port *at91_port, int offset)
>
> The name get_port_pio is a bit confusing, can you rename it to something
> more meaningful, like maybe is_periph_func or something ?
How about at91_is_
On 11/12/24 18:17, Zixun LI wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Eugen Hristev
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/24 17:57, Zixun LI wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:13 PM Eugen Hristev
>>> wrote:
> +static bool at91_get_port_pio(struct at91_port *at91_por
On 11/12/24 17:57, Zixun LI wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:13 PM Eugen Hristev
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> +static bool at91_get_port_pio(struct at91_port *at91_port, int offset)
>>
>> The name get_port_pio is a bit confusing, can you rename it to something
>> more meaningful, like m
Hello,
On 10/18/24 23:27, Zixun LI wrote:
> This patch adds support for determining whether a gpio pin is mapped as
> peripheral function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zixun LI
> ---
> drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 13 -
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers
This patch adds support for determining whether a gpio pin is mapped as
peripheral function.
Signed-off-by: Zixun LI
---
drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c
index 1409db5dc1
6 matches
Mail list logo