Re: [PATCH 1/3] Licenses: Clarify exceptions for standalone apps

2022-10-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:32:40PM +, Paul Barker wrote: > On 2010-01-27, an email [1] was sent to the mailing list by Wolfgang > Denk which clarified the intended licensing exceptions for standalone > applications. As the "export.h" header and the "stubs.c" source files > are required to impl

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Licenses: Clarify exceptions for standalone apps

2022-08-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Paul Barker, In message <20220505153242.1598807-2-paul.bar...@sancloud.com> you wrote: > On 2010-01-27, an email [1] was sent to the mailing list by Wolfgang > Denk which clarified the intended licensing exceptions for standalone > applications. As the "export.h" header and the "stubs.c" sour

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Licenses: Clarify exceptions for standalone apps

2022-05-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:32:40PM +, Paul Barker wrote: > On 2010-01-27, an email [1] was sent to the mailing list by Wolfgang > Denk which clarified the intended licensing exceptions for standalone > applications. As the "export.h" header and the "stubs.c" source files > are required to impl

[PATCH 1/3] Licenses: Clarify exceptions for standalone apps

2022-05-05 Thread Paul Barker
On 2010-01-27, an email [1] was sent to the mailing list by Wolfgang Denk which clarified the intended licensing exceptions for standalone applications. As the "export.h" header and the "stubs.c" source files are required to implement a standalone application, the intention was that these files be