On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-04-07 05:37, Yao Zi wrote:
> > The default binman configuration of RISC-V wraps proper U-Boot into a
> > FIT image instead of shipping a plain image, thus there's no
> > "u_boot_any" entry by default. Let's disable th
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:50:07PM +1200, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Yao,
>
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 15:38, Yao Zi wrote:
> >
> > The default binman configuration of RISC-V wraps proper U-Boot into a
> > FIT image instead of shipping a plain image, thus there's no
> > "u_boot_any" entry by default. L
Hi,
On 2025-04-07 05:37, Yao Zi wrote:
> The default binman configuration of RISC-V wraps proper U-Boot into a
> FIT image instead of shipping a plain image, thus there's no
> "u_boot_any" entry by default. Let's disable the option to prevent
> binman from looking for a plain proper U-Boot image,
Hi Yao,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 15:38, Yao Zi wrote:
>
> The default binman configuration of RISC-V wraps proper U-Boot into a
> FIT image instead of shipping a plain image, thus there's no
> "u_boot_any" entry by default. Let's disable the option to prevent
> binman from looking for a plain proper
The default binman configuration of RISC-V wraps proper U-Boot into a
FIT image instead of shipping a plain image, thus there's no
"u_boot_any" entry by default. Let's disable the option to prevent
binman from looking for a plain proper U-Boot image, failing the build
with message like
Section '
5 matches
Mail list logo
