On 2/4/25 7:30 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 25/01/2025 12:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 1/21/25 1:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 1/21/25 1:07 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 18/01/2025 06:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
whether the .init callback is
On 25/01/2025 12:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 1/21/25 1:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 1/21/25 1:07 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>>> On 18/01/2025 06:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
whether the .init callback is assigned, and if not, sk
On 1/21/25 1:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 1/21/25 1:07 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 18/01/2025 06:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
whether the .init callback is assigned, and if not, skips calling it.
Remove the empty init function. The ent
On 1/21/25 1:07 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 18/01/2025 06:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
whether the .init callback is assigned, and if not, skips calling it.
Remove the empty init function. The entire init callback will be
removed in fol
On 18/01/2025 06:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
> whether the .init callback is assigned, and if not, skips calling it.
> Remove the empty init function. The entire init callback will be
> removed in follow up patches.
>
> Signed-off-by
The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
whether the .init callback is assigned, and if not, skips calling it.
Remove the empty init function. The entire init callback will be
removed in follow up patches.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
---
Cc: Christian Marangi
Cc: Evgeny
6 matches
Mail list logo
