Re: [PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

2025-04-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 12:10:04PM +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On 3/15/25 12:58 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Hendrik, > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM Hendrik Donner wrote: > > > > > > In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved > > > from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD

Re: [PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

2025-03-17 Thread Hendrik Donner
Hello, On 17.03.25 12:10, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Fabio, On 3/15/25 12:58 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Hendrik, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM Hendrik Donner wrote: In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and later to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD, but the CONF

Re: [PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

2025-03-17 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi Fabio, On 3/15/25 12:58 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Hendrik, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM Hendrik Donner wrote: In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and later to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD, but the CONFIG_xPL_BUILD defines are never set for device trees,

Re: [PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

2025-03-15 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Hendrik, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM Hendrik Donner wrote: > > In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved > from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and later to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD, but > the CONFIG_xPL_BUILD defines are never set for device trees, breaking > the build. Move the guards back to CON

[PATCH 1/2] imx8qxp: Do not use CONFIG_XPL_BUILD in device tree

2025-03-14 Thread Hendrik Donner
In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and later to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD, but the CONFIG_xPL_BUILD defines are never set for device trees, breaking the build. Move the guards back to CONFIG_SPL. Fixes: c9713c155127 ("imx8-u-boot: Fix SPL guard option") Signed-off