Hi Rasmus,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 00:41, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2022 17.18, Tom Rini wrote:
> > While it is possible and documented on how to re-run buildman to replace
> > faked required binary files after the fact, this behavior ends up being
> > more confusing than helpful in pra
On 10/10/2022 17.18, Tom Rini wrote:
> While it is possible and documented on how to re-run buildman to replace
> faked required binary files after the fact, this behavior ends up being
> more confusing than helpful in practice. Switch to requiring
> BINMAN_ALLOW_MISSING=1 to be passed on the 'make
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 09:18, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> While it is possible and documented on how to re-run buildman to replace
> faked required binary files after the fact, this behavior ends up being
> more confusing than helpful in practice. Switch to requiring
> BINMAN_ALLOW_MISSING=1 to b
While it is possible and documented on how to re-run buildman to replace
faked required binary files after the fact, this behavior ends up being
more confusing than helpful in practice. Switch to requiring
BINMAN_ALLOW_MISSING=1 to be passed on the 'make' line to enable this
behavior.
Cc: Rasmus V
4 matches
Mail list logo