On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> When moving to gcc-12.2 we started trying to quiet some of the new
> linker warnings, that are not relevant to us. However, a
> misunderstanding of the mechanics at play meant that I intentionally
> omitted passing -z noexecstack to the l
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 13:09, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> When moving to gcc-12.2 we started trying to quiet some of the new
> linker warnings, that are not relevant to us. However, a
> misunderstanding of the mechanics at play meant that I intentionally
> omitted passing -z noexecstack to the linker, whe
When moving to gcc-12.2 we started trying to quiet some of the new
linker warnings, that are not relevant to us. However, a
misunderstanding of the mechanics at play meant that I intentionally
omitted passing -z noexecstack to the linker, when we do need to. Add
this flag and in turn remove warning
3 matches
Mail list logo
