Hi Tom,
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 09:49, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:31:44PM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 30.06.21 г. 16:33 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:30:20AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On 26.06.21 г. 17:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:31:44PM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30.06.21 г. 16:33 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:30:20AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 26.06.21 г. 17:58 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:59:21PM +0200,
Hi,
On 30.06.21 г. 16:33 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:30:20AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
Hi,
On 26.06.21 г. 17:58 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:59:21PM +0200, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
Hi Tom, Marek,
On 25/06/2021 23:59, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:30:20AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26.06.21 г. 17:58 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:59:21PM +0200, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> > > Hi Tom, Marek,
> > >
> > > On 25/06/2021 23:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:51:51PM +
Hi,
On 26.06.21 г. 17:58 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:59:21PM +0200, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
Hi Tom, Marek,
On 25/06/2021 23:59, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:51:51PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 25 June 2021 17:37:44 Tom Rini wrote:
One thing I want to say
On 26.06.21 г. 17:58 ч., Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:59:21PM +0200, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
Hi Tom, Marek,
On 25/06/2021 23:59, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:51:51PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 25 June 2021 17:37:44 Tom Rini wrote:
One thing I want to say h
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:20:31AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 07:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 01:06:12PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Pali,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:58, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Friday 25 Ju
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 07:39, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 01:06:12PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:58, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 25 June 2021 10:43:11 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 25 J
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 01:06:12PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:58, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 25 June 2021 10:43:11 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Pali,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:16, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Friday 25 June 2021
Hi Pali,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:58, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 25 June 2021 10:43:11 Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:16, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 25 June 2021 10:04:14 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > But I do wonder about the
> > > > 100KB grow
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:59:21PM +0200, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> Hi Tom, Marek,
>
> On 25/06/2021 23:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:51:51PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> On Friday 25 June 2021 17:37:44 Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> One thing I want to say here as I think it maybe wasn'
Hi Tom, Marek,
On 25/06/2021 23:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:51:51PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> On Friday 25 June 2021 17:37:44 Tom Rini wrote:
>>> One thing I want to say here as I think it maybe wasn't clear in Marek's
>>> suggestion. Why not have X-Loader boot SPL which lo
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:51:51PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2021 17:37:44 Tom Rini wrote:
> > One thing I want to say here as I think it maybe wasn't clear in Marek's
> > suggestion. Why not have X-Loader boot SPL which loads U-Boot from extN
> > on the eMMC?
>
> Hello Tom! I
On Friday 25 June 2021 17:37:44 Tom Rini wrote:
> One thing I want to say here as I think it maybe wasn't clear in Marek's
> suggestion. Why not have X-Loader boot SPL which loads U-Boot from extN
> on the eMMC?
Hello Tom! I have already answered this in my previous email.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:31:49AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
[snip]
> In regards to SPL - there is no way to sign SPL with the keys used by Nokia
> to sign NOLO(the proprietary second stage loader), we simply don't have
> them. Without that, we can't replace NOLO.
One thing I want to say here
On 25.06.21 г. 19:04 ч., Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Pali,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 07:07, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 25 June 2021 08:38:47 Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:43:43PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/20/21 5:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
As far as I understand, the RX51 ha
On Friday 25 June 2021 10:43:11 Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:16, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 25 June 2021 10:04:14 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > But I do wonder about the
> > > 100KB growth you saw with DT/DM. That seems absolutely enormous to me!
> > > Can you p
Hi Pali,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 10:16, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 25 June 2021 10:04:14 Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 07:07, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 25 June 2021 08:38:47 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:43:43PM +0200, Marek
On Friday 25 June 2021 10:04:14 Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 07:07, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 25 June 2021 08:38:47 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:43:43PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On 6/20/21 5:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hi Pali,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 07:07, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 25 June 2021 08:38:47 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:43:43PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 6/20/21 5:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > As far as I understand, the RX51 has gigabytes
On Friday 25 June 2021 08:38:47 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:43:43PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 6/20/21 5:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > As far as I understand, the RX51 has gigabytes of eMMC storage, so it
> > > > can
> > > > use SPL just like any other O
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:43:43PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 6/20/21 5:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > As far as I understand, the RX51 has gigabytes of eMMC storage, so it can
> > > use SPL just like any other OMAP3 board.
> >
> > U-Boot is being called by the old vendor X-Loader
On 6/20/21 5:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
As far as I understand, the RX51 has gigabytes of eMMC storage, so it can
use SPL just like any other OMAP3 board.
U-Boot is being called by the old vendor X-Loader fork and needs to take
up the existing flash spot.
So, why not place SPL in those 25
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 05:52:03AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 6/19/21 10:51 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > > > > > > > > Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be
> > > > > > > > > > enabled, otherwise link errors
> > > > > > > > > > occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires
> > > >
On 6/19/21 10:51 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
Hi,
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be
enabled, otherwise link errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires
board code to be migrated to
DT, which is not always possible or required.
Fix that by conditionally compiling OF_CONTROL
specific sec
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 11:15:50PM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>
>
> On 19.06.21 г. 22:38 ч., Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 6/19/21 9:33 PM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > > > > > Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be
> > > > > > > > enabled, otherwise link errors
>
On 19.06.21 г. 22:38 ч., Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/19/21 9:33 PM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise
link errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be
migrated to
DT, which is not always possible or required
On 6/19/21 9:33 PM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link
errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be
migrated to
DT, which is not always possible or required.
Fix that by conditionally compiling OF_CONTRO
Hi,
On 19.06.21 г. 21:17 ч., Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/19/21 8:14 AM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
[...]
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link
errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be
migrated to
DT, which is not always possi
On 6/19/21 8:14 AM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
[...]
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link
errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be
migrated to
DT, which is not always possible or required.
Fix that by conditionally compil
Hi Marek,
On 19.06.21 г. 5:23 ч., Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/18/21 6:38 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
+Marek
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:57:23PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link
errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL r
On 6/18/21 6:38 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
+Marek
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:57:23PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be migrated to
DT, which is not al
+Marek
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 04:57:23PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> From: Ivaylo Dimitrov
>
> Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link errors
> occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be migrated to
> DT, which is not always possible or required.
>
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov
Currently DM_USB requires OF_CONTROL to be enabled, otherwise link errors
occur. On the other hand OF_CONTROL requires board code to be migrated to
DT, which is not always possible or required.
Fix that by conditionally compiling OF_CONTROL specific sections in USB
related
34 matches
Mail list logo