On 11/4/23 19:13, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 09:00:07 +0200
Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
many thanks for finding and fixing this!
In different parts of our code we assume that the first RNG device is the
one to be used. Therefore it is preferable to detect the avail
On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 09:00:07 +0200
Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
many thanks for finding and fixing this!
> In different parts of our code we assume that the first RNG device is the
> one to be used. Therefore it is preferable to detect the availability of
> the RNDR register already
In different parts of our code we assume that the first RNG device is the
one to be used. Therefore it is preferable to detect the availability of
the RNDR register already in the bind method.
For signaling the non-existence of a device the driver model requires using
ENOENT (and not ENODEV).
Fix
3 matches
Mail list logo