Re: [PATCH 1/1] examples/api: improve determination of LOAD_ADDR

On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 07:49:36 +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > The current load address for the 'demo' binary does not work for > qemu_arm_defconfig. > > The suitability of an address to load an ELF binary and run it does > not only depend on the architecture but also on the memory layout of >

Re: 回复：[PATCH 1/1] examples/api: improve determination of LOAD_ADDR

On 27.01.25 11:09, 黄利亚 wrote: Hello Heinrich I modified the code for arm32 architecture. You may be using an ARM64 architecture. Take a look at the architecture used. version of U-Boot (commit in git):     d8a7100d658eb201fa0e955667fdff298db31945 operating system and architecture:     5.15.0

??????[PATCH 1/1] examples/api: improve determination of LOAD_ADDR

Hello Heinrich I modified the code for arm32 architecture. You may be using an ARM64 architecture. Take a look at the architecture used. version of U-Boot (commit in git):      d8a7100d658eb201fa0e955667fdff298db31945 operating system and architecture:     5.15.0-130-generic x86_64 installed

[PATCH 1/1] examples/api: improve determination of LOAD_ADDR

The current load address for the 'demo' binary does not work for qemu_arm_defconfig. The suitability of an address to load an ELF binary and run it does not only depend on the architecture but also on the memory layout of the board. On most boards we can assume that 8 MiB of memory is available a