Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:47 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 03:33, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > But currently u-boot doesn't have a proper way to validate those DTS > > > against DT bindings

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Tom, On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 03:33, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > [snip] > > But currently u-boot doesn't have a proper way to validate those DTS > > against DT bindings (maintained in Linux kernel). Although there are > > Devicetree schema

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:35:02AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > + U-boot custodians list > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On 05/12/20

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:44:47PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 16:28, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: [snip] > But currently u-boot doesn't have a proper way to validate those DTS > against DT bindings (maintained in Linux kernel). Although there are > Devicetree schema tools available here [2], there isn't a versioned > release package o

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:39:27AM +, ff wrote: > > > Le 7 déc. 2023 à 21:31, Conor Dooley a écrit : > > What on earth has happened here with quoting? Please fix your mail > client man, this mail is a mess to read. > > Conor: Hopefully I have now fixed MacOS Mail configuration… > For all:

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Le 7 déc. 2023 à 21:31, Conor Dooley a écrit : What on earth has happened here with quoting? Please fix your mail client man, this mail is a mess to read. Conor: Hopefully I have now fixed MacOS Mail configuration… For all: please accept my apologies on past inconveniences. On Thu, Dec 07, 20

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Le 7 déc. 2023 à 19:51, Rob Herring a écrit : On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:08 AM ff wrote: Le 6 déc. 2023 à 21:42, Rob Herring a écrit : On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:05 PM Sumit Garg wrote: On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: + U-b

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

What on earth has happened here with quoting? Please fix your mail client man, this mail is a mess to read. On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:24:01PM +, ff wrote: > > > Le 7 déc. 2023 à 19:51, Rob Herring a écrit : > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:08 AM ff wrote: > > > > Le 6 déc. 2023 à 21:42,

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:08 AM ff wrote: > > > > > Le 6 déc. 2023 à 21:42, Rob Herring a écrit : > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:05 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: > + U-boot

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 02:12, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:05 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > > > > > > On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > + U-boot custodians list > > > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:5

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

> Le 6 déc. 2023 à 21:42, Rob Herring a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:05 PM Sumit Garg wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: + U-boot custodians list On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzy

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:05 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > + U-boot custodians list > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On 05/12/2023 08:1

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Simon, - gzip u-boot:: gzip u-boot-nodtb.bin - Append dtb to gzipped u-boot:: cat u-boot-nodtb.bin.gz /arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/your-board.dtb > u-boot-nodtb.bin.gz-dtb >>> >>> What is this?? Who or what uses a gzipped image with a sin

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 06/12/2023 10:44, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 16:28, Tom Rini wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Mark, On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 13:00, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > From: Ilias Apalodimas > > Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:31:15 +0200 > > > > Hi Caleb, > > > > Late to the party, but I'll respond to as much as I can > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 19:09, Caleb Connolly > > wrote: > > > > > > Histori

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

> From: Ilias Apalodimas > Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:31:15 +0200 > > Hi Caleb, > > Late to the party, but I'll respond to as much as I can > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 19:09, Caleb Connolly > wrote: > > > > Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own > > board/qualcomm/xyz dir

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Tom, On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 16:28, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > Hi Caleb, > > > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Caleb, Late to the party, but I'll respond to as much as I can On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 19:09, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own > board/qualcomm/xyz directory, their own CONFIG_TARGET_XYZ option, their > own hardcoded sysmap-xyz.c file, an

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 09:24, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Sumit, > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 00:44, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 06:22, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sumit, > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 23:21, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Caleb,

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Le 5 déc. 2023 à 13:48, Daniel Thompson a écrit : On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:36:28AM +, ff wrote: Le 5 déc. 2023 à 10:46, Sumit Garg a écrit : + U-boot custodians list On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: @DT bindings maintaine

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: > > + U-boot custodians list > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > >> > >> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: > > @DT bindings maintainers, > > > > Gi

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Sumit, On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 00:44, Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 06:22, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Sumit, > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 23:21, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > > > Hi Caleb, > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly > > > wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Caleb, On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 03:55, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2023 07:44, Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 06:22, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sumit, > >> > >> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 23:21, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Caleb, > >>> > >>> On Tu

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:36:28AM +, ff wrote: > > Le 5 déc. 2023 à 10:46, Sumit Garg a écrit : > > > > + U-boot custodians list > > > >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> wrote: > >> > >> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: > > @DT bindings maintainers, > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

> Le 5 déc. 2023 à 10:46, Sumit Garg a écrit : > > + U-boot custodians list > >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski >> wrote: >> >> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: > @DT bindings maintainers, > > Given the ease of maintenance of DT bindings within Linux ker

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 05/12/2023 07:44, Sumit Garg wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 06:22, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Sumit, >> >> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 23:21, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> >>> Hi Caleb, >>> >>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly >>> wrote: [...] == DT loading == >>>

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote: > + U-boot custodians list > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> >> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: > @DT bindings maintainers, > > Given the ease of maintenance of DT bindings within Linux kernel > source tr

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

+ U-boot custodians list On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>> @DT bindings maintainers, > >>> > >>> Given the ease of maintenance of DT bindings within Linux kernel > >>> source tree, I don't have a specific objection there. But

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Simon, On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 06:22, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Sumit, > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 23:21, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > Hi Caleb, > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly > > wrote: > > > > > > Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own > > > board/q

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> @DT bindings maintainers, >>> >>> Given the ease of maintenance of DT bindings within Linux kernel >>> source tree, I don't have a specific objection there. But can we ease >>> DTS testing for firmware/bootloader projects by providing a versioned >>> relea

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 22:31, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 11:33 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML > > > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > On W

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Sumit, On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 23:21, Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Caleb, > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly > wrote: > > > > Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own > > board/qualcomm/xyz directory, their own CONFIG_TARGET_XYZ option, their > > own hardcoded

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

> Le 4 déc. 2023 à 14:25, Sumit Garg a écrit : > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 16:30, Daniel Thompson > wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML >>> >>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 11:33 PM Sumit Garg wrote: > > + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:06, Neil Armstrong > > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 04/12/2023 15:38, ff wrote: > > >> Le 4 déc. 2023 à 12:00, Daniel Thompson a écrit >> : >> >> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML >>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

> Le 4 déc. 2023 à 12:00, Daniel Thompson a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >> + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML >> >>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: On

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Summit, Here are additional elements that you may want to consider. This topic should be thought of with « who provides what » question in mind. For quite a long time, one single entity was providing secure firmware, firmware, boot loader (I think of Grub when I use this overloaded term), an

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 04/12/2023 14:24, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 16:30, Daniel Thompson > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >>> + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML >>> >>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 16:30, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML > > > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > O

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:02:57AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > + Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:06, Neil Armstrong > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

+ Linux kernel DT bindings maintainers, EBBR ML On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 20:05, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:06, Neil Armstrong > > wrote: > > > > > > On 29/11/2023 16:34, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:06, Neil Armstrong > wrote: > > > > On 29/11/2023 16:34, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 23/11/2023 07:04, Sumit Garg wrote: > > >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:34, Caleb Connolly > > >> wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

> Since with this change, we don't need to embed FDT blob in the u-boot > binary, so I was thinking if we really need to import DTs from Linux > for different platforms and then play a catchup game? > > For now, yes. But why? Is there any value added by l

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Dennis, On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:32, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > A big benefit of using the full dtb in u-boot means it can be used to > boot the system without the need to load a replacement file from disk > or elsewhere, which, AFAIK is required for the System Ready standards > and it definit

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:06, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 29/11/2023 16:34, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > > > > On 23/11/2023 07:04, Sumit Garg wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:34, Caleb Connolly > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 22/11/2023 14:27, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22,

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

A big benefit of using the full dtb in u-boot means it can be used to boot the system without the need to load a replacement file from disk or elsewhere, which, AFAIK is required for the System Ready standards and it definitely helps in cases like EFI booting. Dennis On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:37

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 29/11/2023 16:34, Caleb Connolly wrote: On 23/11/2023 07:04, Sumit Garg wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:34, Caleb Connolly wrote: On 22/11/2023 14:27, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed,

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 23/11/2023 07:04, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:34, Caleb Connolly > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 22/11/2023 14:27, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 a

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 21:34, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > > On 22/11/2023 14:27, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > Hi Cal

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On 22/11/2023 14:27, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: Hi Caleb, On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly wr

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:44:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > Hi Caleb, > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly > > > wrote: > > [snip] > > > > == DT loading =

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > Hi Caleb, > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly > > wrote: > [snip] > > > == DT loading == > > > > > > Previously, boards used the FDT blob embedded into U-Boot (via >

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:51:29AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > Hi Caleb, > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly > wrote: [snip] > > == DT loading == > > > > Previously, boards used the FDT blob embedded into U-Boot (via > > OF_SEPARATE). However, most Qualcomm boards run U-Boot as a sec

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own > board/qualcomm/xyz directory, their own CONFIG_TARGET_XYZ option, their > own hardcoded sysmap-xyz.c file, and their own U-Boot specific > devicetree with little/no compatibilit

Re: [PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Hi Caleb, On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own > board/qualcomm/xyz directory, their own CONFIG_TARGET_XYZ option, their > own hardcoded sysmap-xyz.c file, and their own U-Boot specific > devicetree with little/no c

[PATCH 00/21] Qualcomm generic board support

Historically, Qualcomm boards in U-Boot have all had their own board/qualcomm/xyz directory, their own CONFIG_TARGET_XYZ option, their own hardcoded sysmap-xyz.c file, and their own U-Boot specific devicetree with little/no compatibility with upstream DT. This series makes a few final prepatory ch