Hi,
On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 16:37, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> U-Boot provides a verified-boot feature based around FIT, but there is
> no standard way of implementing it for a board. At present the various
> required pieces must be built up separately, to produce a working
> implementation. In particul
Hi Simon,
On 5/20/21 12:17 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 01:16, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 5/8/21 12:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> U-Boot provides a verified-boot feature based around FIT, but there is
>>> no standard way of implementing it for
Hi Michal,
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 01:16, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 5/8/21 12:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > U-Boot provides a verified-boot feature based around FIT, but there is
> > no standard way of implementing it for a board. At present the various
> > required pieces must be b
Hi Simon,
On 5/8/21 12:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> U-Boot provides a verified-boot feature based around FIT, but there is
> no standard way of implementing it for a board. At present the various
> required pieces must be built up separately, to produce a working
> implementation. In particular, th
U-Boot provides a verified-boot feature based around FIT, but there is
no standard way of implementing it for a board. At present the various
required pieces must be built up separately, to produce a working
implementation. In particular, there is no built-in support for selecting
A/B boot or recov
5 matches
Mail list logo
