Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 21:28, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 18:25, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2025

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-09 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 21:28, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 18:25, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On Mon,

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 18:25, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 20:18, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 03, 2025

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 18:25, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 20:18, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 08:29:13AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On Fri,

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 20:18, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 08:29:13AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 14:04, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 20:18, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 08:29:13AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 14:04, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:42:56PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > On 5/2/25 21:30, Tom Rin

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 08:29:13AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 14:04, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:42:56PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > On 5/2/25 21:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Heinrich Sc

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 05:34:58PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, May 5, 2025, 15:45 Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:58:06PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Neil, > > > > > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 09:06, wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 02/05/2

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, May 5, 2025, 15:45 Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:58:06PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 09:06, wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 02/05/2025 04:50, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > During a recent discussion with Heinrich we dis

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:58:06PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 09:06, wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 02/05/2025 04:50, Simon Glass wrote: > > > During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are > > > kept in a separate repo. > > > > > > The

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Neil, On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 09:06, wrote: > > Hi, > > On 02/05/2025 04:50, Simon Glass wrote: > > During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are > > kept in a separate repo. > > > > The amount of code is small, a tenth of the size of the recently added > > lwip, just b

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-05 Thread neil . armstrong
Hi, On 02/05/2025 04:50, Simon Glass wrote: During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are kept in a separate repo. The amount of code is small, a tenth of the size of the recently added lwip, just by way of example. Testing is a critical part of U-Boot and one of the t

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-03 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 14:04, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:42:56PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 5/2/25 21:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > On 5/2/25 17:06, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Fri,

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:42:56PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 5/2/25 21:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > On 5/2/25 17:06, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:49:12AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > Hi T

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 5/2/25 21:30, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 5/2/25 17:06, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:49:12AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:34, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:50:16PM -0600,

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 5/2/25 17:06, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:49:12AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:34, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:50:16PM -0600

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 5/2/25 17:06, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:49:12AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:34, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:50:16PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are kept in a

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:49:12AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:34, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:50:16PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are > > > kept in a separate r

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 08:34, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:50:16PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are > > kept in a separate repo. > > > > The amount of code is small, a tenth of the size of the recently

Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 08:50:16PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are > kept in a separate repo. > > The amount of code is small, a tenth of the size of the recently added > lwip, just by way of example. Testing is a critical part o

[PATCH 0/3] RFC: test: Bring in the test hooks

2025-05-01 Thread Simon Glass
During a recent discussion with Heinrich we discussed why the hooks are kept in a separate repo. The amount of code is small, a tenth of the size of the recently added lwip, just by way of example. Testing is a critical part of U-Boot and one of the things that distinguishes it from firmware proje