Re: [PATCH] sunxi: don't define MACPWR and SATAPWR to empty strings

2021-01-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:05 AM Andre Przywara wrote: > > On 18/01/2021 00:18, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > There's checks in board/sunxi/board.c if either MACPWR or SATAPWR are > > defined and they are defined by default to a empty string which means > > on vast majority of AllWinner

Re: [PATCH] sunxi: don't define MACPWR and SATAPWR to empty strings

2021-01-18 Thread Andre Przywara
On 18/01/2021 00:18, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Peter, > There's checks in board/sunxi/board.c if either MACPWR or SATAPWR are > defined and they are defined by default to a empty string which means > on vast majority of AllWinner boards when they're not required the > code is still run and with SA

Re: [PATCH] sunxi: don't define MACPWR and SATAPWR to empty strings

2021-01-18 Thread André Przywara
On 18/01/2021 00:18, Peter Robinson wrote: > There's checks in board/sunxi/board.c if either MACPWR or SATAPWR are > defined and they are defined by default to a empty string which means > on vast majority of AllWinner boards when they're not required the > code is still run and with SATAPWR we eve

[PATCH] sunxi: don't define MACPWR and SATAPWR to empty strings

2021-01-17 Thread Peter Robinson
There's checks in board/sunxi/board.c if either MACPWR or SATAPWR are defined and they are defined by default to a empty string which means on vast majority of AllWinner boards when they're not required the code is still run and with SATAPWR we even get an unnecessary 500ms delay booting. So let's