On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> When slave drivers don't set the max_read_size, the spi-mem should
> directly use data.nbytes and not limit to any size. But current
> logic will limit to the max_write_size.
>
> This commit mirrors the same changes in the dm version done in
> co
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:19:40PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> +Tom, Simon,
>
> On 28/07/21 08:50PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> > When slave drivers don't set the max_read_size, the spi-mem should
> > directly use data.nbytes and not limit to any size. But current
> > logic will limit to the max_write_s
+Tom, Simon,
On 28/07/21 08:50PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> When slave drivers don't set the max_read_size, the spi-mem should
> directly use data.nbytes and not limit to any size. But current
> logic will limit to the max_write_size.
With the push towards using DM, do we really need to maintain the nodm
When slave drivers don't set the max_read_size, the spi-mem should
directly use data.nbytes and not limit to any size. But current
logic will limit to the max_write_size.
This commit mirrors the same changes in the dm version done in
commit 535b1fdb8e5e ("spi: spi-mem: Fix read data size issue").
4 matches
Mail list logo