Re: [PATCH] mach-snapdragon: handle platforms without PSCI support

2025-03-17 Thread Caleb Connolly
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:48:55 +, Sam Day wrote: > Most MSM8916 devices shipped without PSCI support. The history is quite > nuanced (a good overview can be found in [1]), but the end result is > that the upstream DTs for this SoC pretend that PSCI exists, and it's > expected that the bootloade

Re: [PATCH] mach-snapdragon: handle platforms without PSCI support

2025-01-27 Thread Sam Day
Hello Mark, On Monday, 27 January 2025 at 17:36, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:48:55 + > > > From: Sam Day m...@samcday.com > > > Hi Sam, > > > Most MSM8916 devices shipped without PSCI support. The history is quite > > nuanced (a good overview can be found in

Re: [PATCH] mach-snapdragon: handle platforms without PSCI support

2025-01-27 Thread Sam Day
Hi Mark, On Monday, 27 January 2025 at 17:51, Sam Day wrote: > > > Hello Mark, > > On Monday, 27 January 2025 at 17:36, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl > wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:48:55 + > > > > > From: Sam Day m...@samcday.com > > > > Hi Sam, > > > > > Most MSM

Re: [PATCH] mach-snapdragon: handle platforms without PSCI support

2025-01-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:48:55 + > From: Sam Day Hi Sam, > Most MSM8916 devices shipped without PSCI support. The history is quite > nuanced (a good overview can be found in [1]), but the end result is > that the upstream DTs for this SoC pretend that PSCI exists, and it's > expected that

[PATCH] mach-snapdragon: handle platforms without PSCI support

2025-01-27 Thread Sam Day
Most MSM8916 devices shipped without PSCI support. The history is quite nuanced (a good overview can be found in [1]), but the end result is that the upstream DTs for this SoC pretend that PSCI exists, and it's expected that the bootloader handles the case where it doesn't. This is codified by the