On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:56:38AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 09.11.20 18:08, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Heinrich Schuchardt
> >> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:36:33 +0100
> >>
> >> On 09.11.20 14:51, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> From: Paulo Alcantara
> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:2
On 09.11.20 18:08, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Heinrich Schuchardt
>> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:36:33 +0100
>>
>> On 09.11.20 14:51, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Paulo Alcantara
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:24:08 -0300
Heinrich Schuchardt writes:
> On 09.11.20 00:58, Pau
> From: Heinrich Schuchardt
> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:36:33 +0100
>
> On 09.11.20 14:51, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Paulo Alcantara
> >> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:24:08 -0300
> >>
> >> Heinrich Schuchardt writes:
> >>
> >>> On 09.11.20 00:58, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> The UEFI specifi
On 09.11.20 15:35, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> Mark Kettenis writes:
>
>> The OpenBSD installation media for armv7 and arm64 use a FAT partition
>> of type 0x0c because the Raspberry Pi firmware doesn't support 0xef.
>> This allows us to have a single FAT partition with the Raspberry Pi
>> firmware,
On 09.11.20 14:51, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Paulo Alcantara
>> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:24:08 -0300
>>
>> Heinrich Schuchardt writes:
>>
>>> On 09.11.20 00:58, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
The UEFI specification does not restrict on the number and location of
ESPs in a system. They are
Mark Kettenis writes:
> The OpenBSD installation media for armv7 and arm64 use a FAT partition
> of type 0x0c because the Raspberry Pi firmware doesn't support 0xef.
> This allows us to have a single FAT partition with the Raspberry Pi
> firmware, U-Boot and /EFI/BOOT/BOOT{ARCH}.EFI.
Yeah, it is
On 09.11.20 14:24, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> Heinrich Schuchardt writes:
>
>> On 09.11.20 00:58, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
>>> The UEFI specification does not restrict on the number and location of
>>> ESPs in a system. They are discovered as required by looking at the
>>> partition type, but firmwar
> From: Paulo Alcantara
> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:24:08 -0300
>
> Heinrich Schuchardt writes:
>
> > On 09.11.20 00:58, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> >> The UEFI specification does not restrict on the number and location of
> >> ESPs in a system. They are discovered as required by looking at the
>
Heinrich Schuchardt writes:
> On 09.11.20 00:58, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
>> The UEFI specification does not restrict on the number and location of
>> ESPs in a system. They are discovered as required by looking at the
>> partition type, but firmware implementations are allowed to support
>> ESPs
On 09.11.20 00:58, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> The UEFI specification does not restrict on the number and location of
> ESPs in a system. They are discovered as required by looking at the
> partition type, but firmware implementations are allowed to support
> ESPs which do not contain a valid partiti
The UEFI specification does not restrict on the number and location of
ESPs in a system. They are discovered as required by looking at the
partition type, but firmware implementations are allowed to support
ESPs which do not contain a valid partition type.
Besides checking for the partition type,
11 matches
Mail list logo