Re: [PATCH] cmd: pxe_utils: sysboot: add label override support

2021-11-13 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Amjad, On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 09:46, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 06/11/2021 01:18, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On 05/11/2021 03:02, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi Amjad, > >> > >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Amjad Ouled-Ameur > >> wrote: > >>> This will allo

Re: [PATCH] cmd: pxe_utils: sysboot: add label override support

2021-11-12 Thread Amjad Ouled-Ameur
Hi Simon, On 06/11/2021 01:18, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: Hi Simon, On 05/11/2021 03:02, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Amjad, On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: This will allow consumers to choose a pxe label at runtime instead of having to prompt the user. One good use-case for t

Re: [PATCH] cmd: pxe_utils: sysboot: add label override support

2021-11-05 Thread Amjad Ouled-Ameur
Hi Simon, On 05/11/2021 03:02, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Amjad, On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: This will allow consumers to choose a pxe label at runtime instead of having to prompt the user. One good use-case for this, is choosing whether or not to apply a dtbo depending

Re: [PATCH] cmd: pxe_utils: sysboot: add label override support

2021-11-04 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Amjad, On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: > > This will allow consumers to choose a pxe label at runtime instead of > having to prompt the user. One good use-case for this, is choosing > whether or not to apply a dtbo depending on the hardware configuration. > e.g: for TI's

[PATCH] cmd: pxe_utils: sysboot: add label override support

2021-10-22 Thread Amjad Ouled-Ameur
This will allow consumers to choose a pxe label at runtime instead of having to prompt the user. One good use-case for this, is choosing whether or not to apply a dtbo depending on the hardware configuration. e.g: for TI's AM335x EVM, it would be convenient to apply a particular dtbo only when the