On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:48:17AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 09:13, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:43:00AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > On 02/08/2022 14.33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > While there are good reasons to use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONF
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 09:13, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:43:00AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > On 02/08/2022 14.33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > While there are good reasons to use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_...))' for
> > > runtime tests, there's equally good reasons to use '#if
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:43:00AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 02/08/2022 14.33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > While there are good reasons to use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_...))' for
> > runtime tests, there's equally good reasons to use '#ifdef CONFIG_...'
> > for build time tests. Reword this messag
On 02/08/2022 14.33, Tom Rini wrote:
> While there are good reasons to use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_...))' for
> runtime tests, there's equally good reasons to use '#ifdef CONFIG_...'
> for build time tests. Reword this message to hopefully avoid confusion.
>
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Signed-off-by: Tom
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 06:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> While there are good reasons to use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_...))' for
> runtime tests, there's equally good reasons to use '#ifdef CONFIG_...'
> for build time tests. Reword this message to hopefully avoid confusion.
>
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Signed-o
While there are good reasons to use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_...))' for
runtime tests, there's equally good reasons to use '#ifdef CONFIG_...'
for build time tests. Reword this message to hopefully avoid confusion.
Cc: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
1 file
6 matches
Mail list logo