On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:54:10AM +0530, Ajay Kaher wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
> >
> >> When the embedded device tree is pointed to by the __dtb_dt_*begin
> >> symbols, it seems to be covered by the early relocation code and doesn't
> >> need
> On 16-Mar-2023, at 1:12 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> !! External Email
>
> Hi Ajay,
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 13:24, Ajay Kaher wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
>>>
When the embedded device tree is pointed to by the __dtb_dt_*begin
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
>
>> When the embedded device tree is pointed to by the __dtb_dt_*begin
>> symbols, it seems to be covered by the early relocation code and doesn't
>> need to be manually patched.
>>
>> Cc: Simon Glass
>> Signed-off-by: Pierr
Hi Ajay,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 13:24, Ajay Kaher wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
> >
> >> When the embedded device tree is pointed to by the __dtb_dt_*begin
> >> symbols, it seems to be covered by the early relocation code and doesn't
> >> need
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
> When the embedded device tree is pointed to by the __dtb_dt_*begin
> symbols, it seems to be covered by the early relocation code and doesn't
> need to be manually patched.
>
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Clémen
5 matches
Mail list logo