On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 07:20:14AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> The "simpler" the logic, the higher the probability to not test and get
> things wrong, again: The absence of a "-PG2" suffix is not sufficient to
> derive that we are on PG1. There is also "IOT2050-ADVANCED-M2".
From: Jan Kiszka
The "simpler" the logic, the higher the probability to not test and get
things wrong, again: The absence of a "-PG2" suffix is not sufficient to
derive that we are on PG1. There is also "IOT2050-ADVANCED-M2".
Finally fix that by exactly matching against the two PG1 device names.
2 matches
Mail list logo
