On 20.05.22 06:39, Chris Packham wrote:
board_get_usable_ram_top() conflated the RAM size with the top address
of RAM. On systems where RAM starts at address 0 these numbers are the
same so it went unnoticed. Update board_get_usable_ram_top() to take
CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE into account when determ
On 20.05.22 06:39, Chris Packham wrote:
board_get_usable_ram_top() conflated the RAM size with the top address
of RAM. On systems where RAM starts at address 0 these numbers are the
same so it went unnoticed. Update board_get_usable_ram_top() to take
CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE into account when determ
board_get_usable_ram_top() conflated the RAM size with the top address
of RAM. On systems where RAM starts at address 0 these numbers are the
same so it went unnoticed. Update board_get_usable_ram_top() to take
CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE into account when determining the top address.
Signed-off-by: Chr
3 matches
Mail list logo