On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:09:31AM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 13.08.20 03:16, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:52:22AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: mx6: Make all i.MX6 SoCs user-selectable
> &g
On 13.08.20 03:16, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:52:22AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] arm: mx6: Make all i.MX6 SoCs user-selectable
>>>
>> []
>>
>>> +
>>> config MX6UL_LITESOM
>>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:52:22AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] arm: mx6: Make all i.MX6 SoCs user-selectable
> >
> []
>
> > +
> > config MX6UL_LITESOM
> > bool
> > select DM
> > select DM_T
Hi Tom,
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: mx6: Make all i.MX6 SoCs user-selectable
>
[]
> +
> config MX6UL_LITESOM
> bool
> select DM
> select DM_THERMAL
> - select MX6UL
Would keep it here to simplify defconfig?
Regards,
Peng.
> select SUPPO
We have a number of platforms that are a combination of a carrier board
and System-on-Module (SoM) that in turn allows for the board to have
different SoCs on it. In some cases, this is handled via board-specific
Kconfig options. In other cases we make use of
CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS. This latte
5 matches
Mail list logo