Re: [PATCH] Makefile: avoid non-standard sed expressions

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:12:14 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The '?' that is used in the sed expression that determines MK_ARCH > is part of the extended regular expression syntax, but the default > behaviour of sed as specified by POSIX is to use only basic regular > expression syntax. Use the equ

Re: [PATCH] Makefile: avoid non-standard sed expressions

Hi Mark, On 11/28/24 12:25 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:42:50 +0100 From: Quentin Schulz Hi Quentin, Hi Mark, On 11/26/24 8:12 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: The '?' that is used in the sed expression that determines MK_ARCH is part of the extended regular expression synta

Re: [PATCH] Makefile: avoid non-standard sed expressions

> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:42:50 +0100 > From: Quentin Schulz Hi Quentin, > Hi Mark, > > On 11/26/24 8:12 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The '?' that is used in the sed expression that determines MK_ARCH > > is part of the extended regular expression syntax, but the default > > behaviour of sed

Re: [PATCH] Makefile: avoid non-standard sed expressions

Hi Mark, On 11/26/24 8:12 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: The '?' that is used in the sed expression that determines MK_ARCH is part of the extended regular expression syntax, but the default behaviour of sed as specified by POSIX is to use only basic regular expression syntax. Use the equivalent '\{0

Re: [PATCH] Makefile: avoid non-standard sed expressions

On 11/26/24 8:12 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: The '?' that is used in the sed expression that determines MK_ARCH is part of the extended regular expression syntax, but the default behaviour of sed as specified by POSIX is to use only basic regular expression syntax. Use the equivalent '\{0,1\}' inst

[PATCH] Makefile: avoid non-standard sed expressions

The '?' that is used in the sed expression that determines MK_ARCH is part of the extended regular expression syntax, but the default behaviour of sed as specified by POSIX is to use only basic regular expression syntax. Use the equivalent '\{0,1\}' instead as suggested by the OpenBSD re_format(7)