Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-06-12 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into > the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through > the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of the SMC911x driver > to DM real hard. >

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/18/20 2:14 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 7:59 PM Tom Rini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:54:51PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:55 PM Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:53:58PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrot

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Joe Hershberger
Hi Tom, On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 7:59 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:54:51PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:55 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:53:58PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On 3/17/20 7:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:54:51PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:55 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:53:58PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On 3/17/20 7:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:43:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:53:58PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/17/20 7:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:43:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 3/17/20 7:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/17/20 7:30 PM,

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/17/20 7:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:43:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 3/17/20 7:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek V

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:43:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/17/20 7:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/17/20 7:10 PM,

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/17/20 7:42 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasu

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > > Drop the exampl

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/17/20 7:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut wrote: Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into the IO access

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:23:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > >> Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into > >> the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should ins

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/17/20 7:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into >> the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through >> the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > > Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into > the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through > the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of the SMC911x driver > to DM real hard. > > Signed

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-17 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 6:19 PM Marek Vasut wrote: > > Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into > the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through > the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of the SMC911x driver > to DM real hard. > > Signed

[PATCH] [RFC] net: smc911x: Drop the standalone EEPROM example

2020-03-14 Thread Marek Vasut
Drop the example, for two reasons. First, it is tapping directly into the IO accessors of the SMC911x, while it should instead go through the net device API. Second, this makes conversion of the SMC911x driver to DM real hard. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Joe Hershberger Cc: Tom Rini --- exa