Re: [U-Boot] CAN console

Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Is there any chance that the stuff posted by miaofng will be available >> in u-boot-next? >> > > I'm not really sure. As Wolfgang Grandegger already commented, the > implementation is really heavy for a mere boot loader. Sharing code

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: Re: Re: [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > miaofng wrote: > >> Hi mike, >> It seems there's a big difference between my current project >> and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now >> > > Yes, can you describe your use-case. CAN in U-BOOT, s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

It seems there's a big difference between my current project >> and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now >> >> i want to get a packet from usb/network, then redirect it to can bus. >> So blocked write/read of can is not allowed. >> > > what's wrong with receiving data ove

[U-Boot] Fw: Re: Re: [PATCH] add u-boot sj a1000/can support

Hi mike, It seems there's a big difference between my current project and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now i want to get a packet from usb/network, then redirect it to can bus. So blocked write/read of can is not allowed. On Monday 26 October 2009 00:48:39 miaofng

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

d to call sja1000_interrupt periodly. It works fine on my board. On Saturday 24 October 2009 00:17:50 miaofng wrote: > From 1f6aaba856fbf484c442eb33cf220774d57fba8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: miaofng > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:06:50 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] [can] add u-boot sja10

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

>From 1f6aaba856fbf484c442eb33cf220774d57fba8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: miaofng Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:06:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [can] add u-boot sja1000/can support Signed-off-by: miaofng --- Makefile |1 + drivers/can/Makefile | 46 drivers/