hi Simon,
yes, you are right, I forgot to call this checking function, thanks!
Best regards
Jianqiang
Simon Glass 于2024年6月6日周四 17:04写道:
> Hi Jianqiang,
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 07:40, jianqiang wang wrote:
> >
> > Dear Das U-Boot developers,
> >
> > I
Dear Das U-Boot developers,
I found that the u-boot device tree implementation lacks a check for the
off_dt_struct field in the device tree.
In file scripts\dtc\libfdt\libfdt_internal.h, fdt_offset_ptr_ returns the
dt struct address. It calculates the address by adding the header address,
fdt off
Could you please forward the issues to whoever is responsible for them?
Gao Xiang 于2024年6月5日周三 13:35写道:
>
>
>
> On 2024/6/5 19:26, jianqiang wang wrote:
> > Hi Xiang,
> >
> > I just checked the second crash, the patch can solve this issue. Did
> > you also loo
Hi Xiang,
I just checked the second crash, the patch can solve this issue. Did
you also look into the other two issues?
Best
Jianqiang
Gao Xiang 于2024年6月5日周三 13:18写道:
>
> Hi Jianqiang,
>
> On 2024/6/5 19:00, jianqiang wang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> &g
nd third may not trigger a crash however, can be observed
by inserting logging before the memset/memcpy function.
Best regards
Gao Xiang 于2024年6月5日周三 05:10写道:
>
>
>
> On 2024/6/5 06:53, jianqiang wang wrote:
> > Hi Das U-Boot developers,
> >
>
> ...
>
> >
>
Hi Das U-Boot developers,
I found several vulnerabilities in the u-boot filesysetm implementation,
1. in file fs/squashfs/sqfs_inode.c function sqfs_inode_size. The
parameter blk_size is directly or indirectly from the storage data.
Howver, without a sanity check, this value is directly used in t
Hi,
I sent this email to das u-boot one month ago, however, I haven't
gotten a reply yet. Do you know what happened?
Best
-- Forwarded message -
发件人: jianqiang wang
Date: 2024年5月1日周三 16:14
Subject: A potential bug in das u-boot nfs implemnetation
To:
Dear all
I fo
7 matches
Mail list logo