hi York,
> On 06/10/2014 02:15 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies for the delay in replying.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:14:23PM +0100, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2014 01:17 PM, York Sun wrote:
On 06/06/2014 10:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> How is TCR_EL2.SH0 (or T
Dear York,
My mailing list disabled a few days. Maybe I missed something important.
> /*
> * Performs a clean & invalidation of the entire data cache at all levels
> */
> void flush_dcache_all(void)
> {
> __asm_flush_dcache_all();
> + flush_l3_cache();
> }
>
I thought the L3 ca
hi Tiger,
> Hi, fenghua:
> Followed your steps, I also downloaded linux-3.14.4.tar.xz .
> And run it with ATF + Uboot.
> It could boot into linux kernel, and hangs at mounting root fs.
>
> Thanks a lot!
I did not test rootfs. It depends on where you place the rootfs(ramdisk or mmc
etc).
The k
Dear Tom, Tiger,
>
> hi Tom,
>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:26:17PM +0800, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi ,
>>>> I have added mmc driver into the vexpress64 board file for uboot and tested
>>>> it o
hi Tom,
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:26:17PM +0800, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi ,
>>> I have added mmc driver into the vexpress64 board file for uboot and tested
>>> it on FVP base model. I tried booting a kernel on that but it
hi Wolfgang,
I am will glad to share my understanding.
> Dear David,
>
> In message <0579e649-f359-415b-a8ed-e1d4267f8...@phytium.com.cn> you wrote:
>>
>>> And if any text base alignment is less than the image's maximum
>>> alignment requirement, the load will fail, and then we likely scra
> Currently cntvoff_el2 is initialised with an arbitrary bag of bits
> derived from the initial value of cnthctl_el2 on the current CPU. This is
> somewhat odd and problematic as some of these bits are UNKNOWN at reset
> and may differ across CPUs (which may cause an OS at EL1 to observe time
> go
> Hi ,
> I have added mmc driver into the vexpress64 board file for uboot and tested
> it on FVP base model. I tried booting a kernel on that but it is aborting
> with the following message:
> Final value for argc=3
> Loading Kernel Image ... OK
> kernel loaded at 0x0008, end = 0x00827024
> On 14-05-16 06:47 AM, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
>>
>> hi Darwin,
>>It's a little late.
>>> I'm hoping someone can help answer these questions about armv8 relocation.
>>>
>>> The CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE seems to be be u
>
> hi Darwin,
> It's a little late.
>> I'm hoping someone can help answer these questions about armv8 relocation.
>>
>> The CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE seems to be be usually setup to a decent amount of
>> alignment. For the purposes of this discussion, let's say it would normally
>> be 0x8800
Hi Jeroen，
> Hello Tom,
>
> On vr, 2014-05-16 at 17:15 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:28:25PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Darwin,
>>>
>>> In message <53763b78.6030...@broadcom.com> you wrote:
3. Fixed offset case:
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE = 0x8820
hi Darwin,
It's a little late.
> I'm hoping someone can help answer these questions about armv8 relocation.
>
> The CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE seems to be be usually setup to a decent amount of
> alignment. For the purposes of this discussion, let's say it would normally
> be 0x8800 and al
12 matches
Mail list logo
