We have understood what Scott was suggesting but still need to try the changes
suggested by him.
We haven't started on it yet.
Regards,
Aneesh Bansal
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:03 PM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:29 PM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431;
> Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> secure bo
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 10:34 PM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431;
> Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> secure bo
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 10:38 PM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> secure boot target for P3041
>
> On Th
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:41 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> secure boot target for P3041
>
> On Thu
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:43 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> secure boot target for P3041
>
> [Re
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 10:22 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> secure boot target for P3041
>
> On
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:31 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: Bansal Aneesh-B39320; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot
> target for B4860QDS
>
> On 03/10/20
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:31 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gupta
> Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/p1010rdb: SECURE BOOT-
> define CONFIG_SYS_RAMBO
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:01 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot
> target for B4860QDS
>
> On 03/07/2014 05:23 AM, Aneesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:30 PM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: Sun York-R58495; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gupta
> Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/p1010rdb: SECURE BOOT-
> define CONFIG_SYS_RAMB
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:42 PM
> To: Wolfgang Denk; Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/p1010rdb: SECURE BOOT-
> define CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 4:32 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot
> target for B4860QDS
>
> On Mon,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:38 AM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/p1010rdb: SECURE BOOT- enable workaround
> for IFC errata A003399
>
> On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 2
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 7:42 PM
> To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SECURE BOOT: add version info for ISBC
>
> Dear Aneesh,
>
> In message
-B07421; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/p1010rdb: SECURE BOOT- define
> CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT for NAND boot
>
> Dear "aneesh.ban...@freescale.com",
>
> In message
> <680c371d651d49a08b33ddd4d01fb...@dm2pr03mb415.nampr
> > ISBC creates a LAW 0 entry for non PBL platforms, which is not
> > disabled before transferring the control to uboot.
> > The LAW 0 entry has to be disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 58
> >
>
>> In case of secure boot, boot from NAND is ramboot.
>> It was removed by some other commit. So defining it again.
>
>In case of not-secure-boot, it's not ramboot.
>
>What user of CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT are you concerned about? Many of them
>look like this:
>
>#elif !defined(CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT) && de
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
>> index 4c7f0b1..db124df 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
>> @@ -15,5 +15,11 @@
>> #endif
>> #define CONFIG_SY
>> The workaround for IFC errata A003399 was not enabled
>> in case of secure boot. So, secure boot from NOR was not
>> working.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal
>> ---
>> include/configs/P1010RDB.h | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/configs/P1
>>
>> > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SINGLE_SOURCE_CLK
>> > Single Source Clock is clocking mode present in some of FSL
>> > SoC's.
>> > In this mode, a single differential clock is used to supply
>>
>> You already have all relevant information present in the current
>>
> T4/B4 SoC's have a different version of ISBC. The secure boot
> functionality is different with the new version of ISBC
> compared to the earlier SoC's. So the version information is added
> in file config_mpc85xx.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal
> ---
> README
22 matches
Mail list logo
