Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] arm/ls102xa:add hwconfig setting to support disable unused devices.

Hi, York Alison help me find out a macro definition mistake, v2 just correct this mistake. I will resend it again and add change-log in. Zhuoyu > -Original Message- > From: Sun York-R58495 > Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 12:07 AM > To: Zhang Zhuoyu-B46552 > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de;

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm/ls102xa:add hwconfig setting to support disable unused devices.

Hi, Alison Please see the comments inline. Zhuoyu > -Original Message- > From: Wang Huan-B18965 > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 4:15 PM > To: Zhang Zhuoyu-B46552; Sun York-R58495 > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188 > Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm/ls102xa:add hwconfig setting to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm:ls1021a: Reserve secure code into RAM instead of OCRAM

Hi, York Could you help ACK this patch? Best Regards Zhuoyu > -Original Message- > From: Zhang Zhuoyu-B46552 > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:25 AM > To: Sun York-R58495 > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Jin Zhengxiong-R64188; Wang Huan-B18965 > Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm:ls1021a: Reserve sec

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm:ls1021a: Reserve secure code into RAM instead of OCRAM

Hi, York Sorry for the delay, I wrongly filter this patch and missed it. As for your question, if platform does not define CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE, U-boot will help define a default secure text section in linker script to reserve secure code. CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE for LS1 is previously def