Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:40 Tue 03 Mar , Tom Evans wrote:
>> BUG IN ITEST
>>
>> itest crashes ARM chips. I can "iread.b *8200 == 0",
>> but "iread.b *8201 == 0" throws an alignment
>>
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:40 Tue 03 Mar , Tom Evans wrote:
>> I'm implementing a rather complex boot that involves flags
>> and counters in EEPROM.
>
> in which case do you need this?
>
> update?
Yes, it is when updating the Linux K
return (l & ((1 << (w * 8)) - 1));
}
"l = *p" works on a 486 but not on an ARM. It is a simple change - a
three-way case on the width reading through the "right pointer".
Yes, I should fix this and submit a patch, but I'm not working on
anything close to the di
s. The code doesn't match the
comments, and it probably isn't following the manufacturer's
specification for this timing either.
Anyone else based of the Zylonite port might like to check their code.
--
===
Tom Evans tom.ev...@ceos.com.au
CEOS Pty Ltd www.ceos.com.au
3/1
rs and programs required to then partition the NAND and burn
U-Boot into it. We then partition and format an SD card for the
filesystem into a SD card, but we have the option of putting it into
NAND, and have done so.
-- Tom Evans
___
U-Boot mailing
to send the patch as a zipped attachment. Or
gzipped. Is this allowable or does it have to be "real email text"?
-
===
Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CEOS Pty Ltd www.ceos.com.au
3/17 Burgundy St, Heidelberg,
Victoria 3084, Australia
Phone (+61 3) 9458
> From: Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM: net.c: UDP Checksum code
> failing every packet
> To: Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: U-Boot
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IS
gt; 16) & 0x;
xsum += (ntohl(tmp) >> 0) & 0x0000;
I'm afraid I can't generate a patch to do this. Could someone else
please incorporate this change if required?
Tom Evans
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
8 matches
Mail list logo
