Hi Stefan,
>
>I just "touched" the file "arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/usbdev.c" again to
>remove
>some GCC 4.6 compiler warnings. While doing this I wondered (again) if
>anybody
>is using this "driver" at all. I definitely never did. And I'm wondering
>if
>this code is useful at all.
>
>So Marri (or any
<
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
<
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Stefan,
Yes. Mike, could you please re-send your patch with this suggested split?
Marri, could you please test this result on an 460SX board? And perhaps send
send a patch to fix potentially remaining 460SX issues?
*[Tirumala Marri] *Sure we will test Mike’s fix on our 460Sx board
Mike and Stefan,
>Thanks. Unfortunately this patch introduces compile errors for 460SX
boards
>(e.g. redwood):
>[stefan@kubuntu u-boot-ppc4xx (master)]$ ./MAKEALL redwood
>Configuring for redwood board...
>speed.c: In function 'get_sys_info':
>speed.c:339: error: 'PLLD_FWDVA_MASK' undeclared (f
Hi Wolfgang,
Stefan asked before, but you did not reply yet, so here I ask again:
What exactly are your plans? You did not respond to the Eiger patches
for the last 9 months, so I somewhat doubt you are going to submit
usable patches within the next couple of days, or are you?
[marri] I will hav
Yes, that's what I mean: the code get's dropped, and then nobody ever
cares about it again. Such unmaintained code is basicly useless to
everyone, and just adds efforts that coul better be used for other
work.
> Marri (or somebody else from APM): Do you plan to support the 460SX
boards?
> Then pl
>
> Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks.
Thanks
Marri
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Stefan,
>
> Please wait a day or two. I have an idea on how to best cleanup this
> PPC4xx
> header mess and will post some patches for it soon. It would be best if
> you
> could rebase your work on those patches then (if we find a consensus
> here).
Sure I will wait for your changes.
Regards,
M
> > > include/apm821xx.h | 493
> +++
> >
> > I know that Wolfgang specifically asked you to add this file for this
> > "new" SoC. But I'm not so sure if this is the right way. Most of the
> > defines in this new file are a plain copy from include/p
Please ignore this series. I missed "PATCH" string. I will resend the
correct patch set.
--Marri
> -Original Message-
> From: tma...@apm.com [mailto:tma...@apm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 5:19 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: s...@denx.de; Tirumala
Mr Wolfgang,
> Hm... is this APM82? Official press releases refer to this as
> APM821xx? Or ist it APM82xxx?
[Marri] You are correct APM821XX is right name.
>
> If you don't decide to print "64" here, then please pull all the
> APM82???
> code into a separate #ifdef block.
[Marri] Sure will do.
>
Mr Wolfgang,
>
> On the other hand, this seems to be a 464 core, so should we not print
> 464 here?
[Marri] Interesting point, For all other processors we were printing SoC
name not the CPU core name.
APM82xxx is SoC name.
> > diff --git a/include/ppc440.h b/include/ppc440.h
> > index c807dda..b
Hi Stefan,
> > Add bluestone board name to the board.cfg.
> > Change Makefile to include bluestone board support.
>
> Not needed with board.cfg now. Please remove your changes to Makefile.
>
[Marri] You mean we only need board.cfg change and we don't need Makefile
entry ?
Regards,
Marri
_
t;
> Dear tma...@apm.com,
>
> In message <1282856780-24660-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you
> wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > Add bluestone board name to the board.cfg.
>
> NAK. This must not ne a separate commit.
>
>
> > Change Ma
@apm.com,
>
> In message <1282856759-24503-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you
> wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > This patch adds 32bit DDR2 static as well as dynamic
> > setting of different DRAM parameters like CAS and read/write
> > delays.
> >
t;
> Dear tma...@apm.com,
>
> In message <1282856749-24425-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you
> wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > This patch adds APM82XXX specific definitions, which include
> > clock and boot strap.
> >
&
r tma...@apm.com,
>
> In message <1282856775-24619-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you
> wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > Add support code for bluestone board wth APM82XXX processor based.
> > This patch includes early board init, misc init, configure
@apm.com,
>
> In message <1282856765-24544-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you
> wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > This patch adds Universal Interrupt Controller support for
> > APM82XXX processor.
>
> Again. This is NOT a separate, independent commit
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx-isram.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx-isram.h
> > index d6d17ac..b723401 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx-isram.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx-isram.h
> > @@ -25,7 +25,
>
> > This patch adds Universal Interrupt Controller support for
> > APM82XXX processor.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx-uic.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc4xx-uic.h
> > index 782d045..238b70b 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/a
>
> On Thursday 26 August 2010 23:06:20 tma...@apm.com wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > Add bluestone board name to the board.cfg.
> > Change Makefile to include bluestone board support.
>
> Not needed with board.cfg now. Please remove your changes
U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] APM82xxx: Add CPU support
>
> Hi Marri,
>
> On Thursday 26 August 2010 23:05:44 tma...@apm.com wrote:
> > From: Tirumala Marri
> >
> > APM82XXX is a new line of SoCs which are derivatives of
> > PPC44X family of processors. This patch adds suppor
>>Please see the "Patches" page in the U-Boot wiki.
Thanks. Question on line length 80 in some files. Some of the config
(EX:include/configs/Canyonlands.h) files
has lines longer than 80 characters. Does newly added config files can
still have lines longer than 80 ?
Or should I trim ?
Regards,
Mar
Hi,
It has been a while I submitted u-boot patches. Can someone please send me
updated guide lines.
Thanks in Advance,
Marri
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
26 matches
Mail list logo
